Mike Tyson recently sparked intense debate by dismissing Floyd Mayweather’s claim of being the greatest boxer of all time (GOAT). Tyson, known for his brutal honesty, critiqued Mayweather’s record, particularly highlighting how the unbeaten 50-0 record pales in comparison to legendary fighters like Julio César Chávez and Sugar Ray Robinson. Tyson emphasized that these fighters did not “cherry-pick” their opponents but fought whoever ranked highest, often more frequently each year than Mayweather did.

For instance, Chávez Sr. amassed an 89-0 record before his first defeat, often fighting up to eight times a year. Tyson pointed out that Mayweather’s selection of opponents was more strategic, while fighters like Chávez took on any top challenger without hesitation. Tyson also mentioned Sugar Ray Robinson’s 40-1 record before going on an incredible 78-fight winning streak, further highlighting the difference in mindset and competition.

Tyson acknowledged Mayweather’s greatness but clarified that in his view, other fighters showed more consistent dominance over a longer period. Tyson even admitted to preferring Manny Pacquiao’s style of fighting, adding another layer to the criticism. While Mayweather has focused on exhibition matches post-retirement, Chávez and Robinson built legacies in an era where fighters were more active, fighting often and against top competition.

This critique of Mayweather is part of a broader debate on what makes a fighter truly great—whether it’s a perfect record, the caliber of opponents, or the frequency of fights. Fans remain divided, with some supporting Tyson’s perspective while others argue that Mayweather’s skill and defensive genius make him unparalleled​(